I have spent some space here reflecting on what is often called the problem of evil. The problem of evil revolves around the following logic:
- God is all loving.
- God is all powerful.
- If God is both all loving and all powerful, there would be no suffering in the world.
- There is suffering in the world.
- Thus God must not be all loving or all powerful.
This argument carries some force. It is among the reasons some Christians have ascribed to the idea of Open Theism, because if God is limited he cannot be held responsible. People of all religious stripes grapple with something that simple feels wrong in the world. Somehow we know things are not as they were created to be.
For many years I grappled with this question. It was an interview on Dr. James Dobson's Focus on the Family that began a change of perspective. I don't remember who it was Dr. Dobson was interviewing or why. I do remember that there was a conversation about the suffering this father experiences with the illness or death of his son. And Dobson asked how he dealt with the heavy weight of that grief , especially the question, "Why me? Why my son?" The interviewee didn't skip a beat. "Why not?"
You see, the problem of evil assumes another truth as well, that is that we somehow merit the good of our God. In part this man came to grips with his grief by remembering that we deserve nothing. All our life is a debt to the love of God for us. This great God we mocked, beat, stripped naked, and crucified. This great God who died at our hands.
For me the question easily becomes the problem of the good. How is that God would embrace us, those who crucified love?
I feel we have a better theological grip on things when we root ourselves in the stark reality of Creation, Fall, and Redemption. But further reading has pressed me even beyond this. I am asked to wonder if there isn't such a thing as redemptive suffering.
Redemptive suffering is something almost completely foreign to American Evangelicalism. Most of us still can't see beyond ourselves long enough to stop asking the question, "Why me?" The curious thing about redemptive is that it doesn't ask any questions. There is no problem of evil. There is no problem of good. Suffering is placed firmly within Providence.
And that word is something I struggle with. I am a Wesleyan theologian, a Free Methodist elder. We love to talk about holiness, the freedom to love him wholly. And that freedom hinges on our ability to choose either Life or Death, either the Christ or self. So we'll leave that word with the Father for now.
In any case, each moment is understood as gift, a place in time where we may discover the Spirit's movement and breathe in Life. In this sense, each moment becomes the same to us. Like Paul we become indifferent to either health or illness, freedom or incarceration because in all things we are rooted in Christ.
But it goes further still. All suffering is rooted in sin. Whether natural or otherwise, suffering comes into the world through sin. My sin. My sin, and yours, pollutes the earth, festers wars, rapes women, mutates cancers, topples buildings in Port-au-Prince. Were there no sin, there would be no suffering. Sin gives birth to suffering. My sin.
It might lead us to despair, except for Christ. Joined to Christ, our suffering becomes redemptive. If I suffer, I suffer because of sin, whether mine or someone else's. In either case, I can offer that suffering to God who suffers with us and whose suffering redeems.
I'm finding it difficult to articulate what I mean. When we embrace faith, we embrace the life of Christ in its fullness. We embrace the suffering of those around us. And more than that we embrace the suffering inflicted on us. Christ didn't run when the crowds shouted, "Crucify him!" He embraced that suffering and offered to our Father for the work of redemption. While our life, death, and resurrection saves no one, I have come to believe that when we suffer we may, like our Jesus, offer it to the Father for the work of redemption. Perhaps it is our redemption. Perhaps when we offer up our suffering we do it for ourselves. Perhaps, though, we might offer it God that others will not suffer, that because we suffer others will not.
And so I find myself evolving again beyond the problem of good to offering my suffering to God for the work of redemption within the world.
For many years I grappled with this question. It was an interview on Dr. James Dobson's Focus on the Family that began a change of perspective. I don't remember who it was Dr. Dobson was interviewing or why. I do remember that there was a conversation about the suffering this father experiences with the illness or death of his son. And Dobson asked how he dealt with the heavy weight of that grief , especially the question, "Why me? Why my son?" The interviewee didn't skip a beat. "Why not?"
You see, the problem of evil assumes another truth as well, that is that we somehow merit the good of our God. In part this man came to grips with his grief by remembering that we deserve nothing. All our life is a debt to the love of God for us. This great God we mocked, beat, stripped naked, and crucified. This great God who died at our hands.
For me the question easily becomes the problem of the good. How is that God would embrace us, those who crucified love?
I feel we have a better theological grip on things when we root ourselves in the stark reality of Creation, Fall, and Redemption. But further reading has pressed me even beyond this. I am asked to wonder if there isn't such a thing as redemptive suffering.
Redemptive suffering is something almost completely foreign to American Evangelicalism. Most of us still can't see beyond ourselves long enough to stop asking the question, "Why me?" The curious thing about redemptive is that it doesn't ask any questions. There is no problem of evil. There is no problem of good. Suffering is placed firmly within Providence.
And that word is something I struggle with. I am a Wesleyan theologian, a Free Methodist elder. We love to talk about holiness, the freedom to love him wholly. And that freedom hinges on our ability to choose either Life or Death, either the Christ or self. So we'll leave that word with the Father for now.
In any case, each moment is understood as gift, a place in time where we may discover the Spirit's movement and breathe in Life. In this sense, each moment becomes the same to us. Like Paul we become indifferent to either health or illness, freedom or incarceration because in all things we are rooted in Christ.
But it goes further still. All suffering is rooted in sin. Whether natural or otherwise, suffering comes into the world through sin. My sin. My sin, and yours, pollutes the earth, festers wars, rapes women, mutates cancers, topples buildings in Port-au-Prince. Were there no sin, there would be no suffering. Sin gives birth to suffering. My sin.
It might lead us to despair, except for Christ. Joined to Christ, our suffering becomes redemptive. If I suffer, I suffer because of sin, whether mine or someone else's. In either case, I can offer that suffering to God who suffers with us and whose suffering redeems.
I'm finding it difficult to articulate what I mean. When we embrace faith, we embrace the life of Christ in its fullness. We embrace the suffering of those around us. And more than that we embrace the suffering inflicted on us. Christ didn't run when the crowds shouted, "Crucify him!" He embraced that suffering and offered to our Father for the work of redemption. While our life, death, and resurrection saves no one, I have come to believe that when we suffer we may, like our Jesus, offer it to the Father for the work of redemption. Perhaps it is our redemption. Perhaps when we offer up our suffering we do it for ourselves. Perhaps, though, we might offer it God that others will not suffer, that because we suffer others will not.
And so I find myself evolving again beyond the problem of good to offering my suffering to God for the work of redemption within the world.


